[Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel Andre van Tonder (25 Apr 2011 02:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel Alex Shinn (25 Apr 2011 03:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel John Cowan (25 Apr 2011 05:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel John Cowan (25 Apr 2011 05:40 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Shadowing imports at toplevel John Cowan 25 Apr 2011 05:08 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> In this case, though, you've posted multiple messages to
> the list bringing up various nuances of the same issue - what
> happens when you import or define the same identifier multiple
> times?  This is intentionally left unspecified in the first draft -
> for _all_ variations - and there are already tickets opened
> (#112 and #158) to address whether we need to specify this.

I'd rather that Andre and others went ahead and brought up these points,
even if they're duplicative.  A little extra work to strip duplicate
tickets is better than discouraging knowledgeable people from posting
by requiring them to search the tickets first.

--
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
Assent may be registered by a signature, a handshake, or a click of a computer
mouse transmitted across the invisible ether of the Internet. Formality
is not a requisite; any sign, symbol or action, or even willful inaction,
as long as it is unequivocally referable to the promise, may create a contract.
       --Specht v. Netscape

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports