Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (23 Oct 2011 22:50 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (24 Oct 2011 14:09 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Aubrey Jaffer (24 Oct 2011 16:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (24 Oct 2011 21:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (24 Oct 2011 23:58 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Andre van Tonder (24 Oct 2011 16:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alaric Snell-Pym (24 Oct 2011 16:09 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Alex Shinn (25 Oct 2011 00:07 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (24 Oct 2011 17:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr Ray Dillinger (24 Oct 2011 21:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan (24 Oct 2011 21:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr John Cowan 24 Oct 2011 21:50 UTC

Ray Dillinger scripsit:

> It's my opinion that keeping all of the procedures c(a|d){1,4}r
> is not harmful and not a burden on implementors, and that doing
> otherwise constitutes a completely unwarranted and undesirable
> change in the standard.

There is no question of removing them.

The issue is moving them from the base library to a novel library.

--
On the Semantic Web, it's too hard to prove     John Cowan    cowan@ccil.org
you're not a dog.  --Bill de hOra               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports