Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] redefining eqv?
Peter Kourzanov 24 Dec 2010 22:11 UTC
On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 15:39 -0500, John Cowan wrote:
> Peter Kourzanov scripsit:
>
> > > Peter, the better way to do the kind of thing you are looking for
> > > is PARAMETERIZE. I wouldn't advocate it for CASE, though.
> >
> > Any pointers? Or is it the PLT/Racket thing?
>
> SRFI 39.
>
So, RRS's (fluid) redux (or shall I say Rabbit redux). Its so
well-hidden I didn't know it existed. Any plans on going back
that for R7RS?
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
