Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Alex Shinn (09 Jan 2013 02:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Andy Wingo (09 Jan 2013 08:06 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Alex Shinn (09 Jan 2013 09:20 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Alaric Snell-Pym (09 Jan 2013 09:43 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Per Bothner (09 Jan 2013 20:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions John Cowan (09 Jan 2013 20:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Aaron W. Hsu (09 Jan 2013 21:58 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions John Cowan (10 Jan 2013 07:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions Alex Shinn (09 Jan 2013 23:23 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 6.11 Exceptions John Cowan 10 Jan 2013 07:00 UTC

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> If you want to talk about errors, then we should really talk about
> error taxonomies. In there, even despite having a RAISE-CONTINUABLE
> primitive, it may make sense to have a sort of error that explicitly
> marks itself as "continuable."

I strongly believe that it does not.  The content of a condition is set
by the entity that knows its nature, which is not the same entity that
reports it to the exception system.

--
[W]hen I wrote it I was more than a little              John Cowan
febrile with foodpoisoning from an antique carrot       cowan@ccil.org
that I foolishly ate out of an illjudged faith          http://ccil.org/~cowan
in the benignancy of vegetables.  --And Rosta

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports