Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #382: Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs
Vassil Nikolov 12 Oct 2012 01:53 UTC
John Boyle <johnthescavenger@gmail.com> wrote:
> ... All Common Lisp implementations I've tested flat-out disallow
> "redefinition of the special form "if"".
One can shadow IF; does that count? [*]
By the way, what would an `if' with multiple
name-value pairs offer that `cond' doesn't?
_________
[*] _Any_ symbol in the COMMON-LISP package
cannot be redefined; and then it is the standard
that prohibits it, not the discretion of implementations.
---Vassil.
--
Would you like your metaphors shaken or stirred?
Vassil Nikolov | Васил Николов | < vnikolov@pobox.com>
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports