Re: [Scheme-reports] auxiliary syntax
Eli Barzilay 07 Jan 2013 14:19 UTC
Just now, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>
> +1, except that it's even simpler than that -- there are some common
> names that are often used in multiple places as is (for example, `+'
> or `if'), no need for escapes.
(Forgot a smiley here -- obviously you'd have to be insane to have a
library define `+' and `if'.)
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports