Re: [Scheme-reports] bodies in case and cond clauses
Andy Wingo 19 May 2011 21:33 UTC
On Thu 19 May 2011 19:48, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes:
> Andy Wingo scripsit:
>> Suggestion: make the clauses in `case' and `cond' forms (without =>,
>> naturally) be BODY instances, to allow them to have definitions. It is
>> well defined AFAIK, and costs nothing.
>
> Ticket filed. I'm against this one, though, because of the bizarre
> appearance of (cond ((pred1) (define ...) (e1)) ...). Internal definitions
> always come first everywhere else in Scheme except at the top level and
> top-level BEGINs.
A fair point.
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports