Re: [Scheme-reports] clarification of proposal for eqv?/eq? on procedures
John Cowan 09 Jun 2013 14:12 UTC
Taylan Ulrich B. scripsit:
> This raises for me the question though, may eq? return #t for empty
> strings, empty vectors, or empty bytevectors, where eqv? returns #f?
No, because of the sentence at the beginning of 6.1:
Of the equivalence predicates described in this section, eq? is
the finest or most discriminating, equal? is the coarsest,
and eqv? is slightly less discriminating than eq?.
--
John Cowan cowan@ccil.org
"Not to know The Smiths is not to know K.X.U." --K.X.U.
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports