Re: [Scheme-reports] Formal Response #440: Write procedure is not backwards compatible
Alex Shinn 11 Oct 2012 23:08 UTC
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:03 AM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #440:
>
> Write procedure is not backwards compatible
>
> The WG voted to provide three procedures, write, write-simple, and
> write-shared. The write procedure generates datum labels only if its
> argument contains circular structure. This is upward compatible
> with R5RS write, which only works correctly on non-circular structure.
>
> The write-shared procedure never generates datum labels, and
> therefore fails if the argument contains circular structure.
That should read "write-simple."
--
Alex
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports