On Mon, 23 May 2011 12:02:05 -0400, Manuel Simoni <msimoni@gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's a quite hairy and integral part of the expansion process, and as
> such I have the feeling that it should be specified in WG1, even if
> WG1 itself has no procedural macros.

I don't think it is on the list, and I doubt that we can address it. This
is much more likely to be in the purview of WG2. I have hinted at a form
like this for WG2 called "meta."

	Aaron W. Hsu

--
Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports