On 08/31/2013 04:34 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:
>     Having test-numeric-syntaxes take a long list of tests makes it
>     more difficult to deal with individual tests, in terms of
>     debugging or marking them as expected failures.
>
>
> This was adapted largely as-is from Peter Bex's numeric test
> suite for R5RS, pruning a lot.  Possibly I overlooked some
> tests that are no longer valid, please let me know if you find
> any.
>
> Converting to a single test-numeric-syntax macro would
> indeed be better.  Patches welcome :)

The attached patch drops test-numeric-syntaxes,
but shouldn't change any actual tests.  Tested under
Chibi and Kawa (with some modifications).
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports