Re: [Scheme-reports] library syntax: "visiting" a library left undefined?
John Cowan 04 Jan 2013 15:26 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> > Similarly, during the expansion of a library {\cf foo}, if
> > any syntax keywords imported from another library {\cf (bar)}
> > are needed to expand the library, then the library {\cf (bar)}
> > must be expanded and its syntax definitions evaluated before the
> > expansion of {\cf (foo)}.
>
> This looks fine to me.
Adopted and pushed (with the proper parens around the first instance of
"foo").
--
You let them out again, Old Man Willow! John Cowan
What you be a-thinking of? You should not be waking! cowan@ccil.org
Eat earth! Dig deep! Drink water! Go to sleep!
Bombadil is talking. http://ccil.org/~cowan
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports