|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
John Cowan
(19 May 2011 21:42 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(20 May 2011 09:32 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alex Queiroz
(20 May 2011 09:38 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 May 2011 10:36 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Eli Barzilay
(23 May 2011 10:41 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(23 May 2011 22:50 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 08:25 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Emmanuel Medernach
(24 May 2011 08:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Alaric Snell-Pym
(24 May 2011 09:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 May 2011 18:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: when and unless Arthur A. Gleckler (24 May 2011 19:35 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
leppie
(24 May 2011 08:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 09:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
leppie
(24 May 2011 09:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
John Cowan
(24 May 2011 14:51 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Pierpaolo Bernardi
(24 May 2011 14:57 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] when and unless
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 May 2011 18:56 UTC)
|
I also prefer to keep UNTIL and WHILE out of WG1. I'm not a big fan of UNLESS and WHEN, either, but they at least don't encourage imperative programming.
