[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer 29 Apr 2014 07:55 UTC
Jay Freeman <jay_reynolds_freeman@mac.com> writes:
> Thus I suggest that issue #1 not be addressed without also
> simultaneously addressing means whereby Scheme users who wish to trade
> accuracy for speed in numerical work, may do so.
I thought that was done simply by introducing an inexact number anywhere
in the calculation, since inexactness is "contagious". For example by
starting out with inexact constants ("1.0" instead of "1"), using the
`inexact' procedure on initial inputs, etc.
Taylan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.