Re: Procedural equivalence: the last debate Arthur A. Gleckler (09 Jun 2013 05:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Andy Wingo (09 Jun 2013 09:33 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate taylanbayirli@gmail.com (09 Jun 2013 12:49 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Procedural equivalence: the last debate Andy Wingo 09 Jun 2013 09:32 UTC

On Sun 09 Jun 2013 06:09, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes:

> `eq?` must always return the same as `eqv?` on procedures.

FWIW -- which is probably not much, because this list does not seem to
contain a quorum of implementors -- -1 for this.  Eq? is a pointer
comparison operator, not an equivalence predicate.

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports