Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers
John Cowan 11 May 2011 18:49 UTC
Andy Wingo scripsit:
> Diplomacy aside, I do think that it would be an error to settle on ER
> as the blessed procedural macro transformer for WG2.
What a pity you didn't join WG2.
> I also do not share Alex's aversion to identifier-syntax.
WG2 has not yet voted on whether to include (any version of)
identifier-syntax: it is on the revote docket, and will be decided on
when WG2 reawakens.
--
A rabbi whose congregation doesn't want John Cowan
to drive him out of town isn't a rabbi, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
and a rabbi who lets them do it cowan@ccil.org
isn't a man. --Jewish saying
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports