Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson (15 Mar 2012 06:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson (15 Mar 2012 06:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan (15 Mar 2012 15:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan (15 Mar 2012 15:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson (16 Mar 2012 03:31 UTC)
Re: parameterize missing parentheses Arthur A. Gleckler (18 Mar 2012 04:19 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses Alan Watson (27 Mar 2012 06:01 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan (27 Mar 2012 14:01 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] parameterize missing parentheses John Cowan 27 Mar 2012 14:01 UTC

Alan Watson scripsit:

> In the syntax of library rename clauses in �5.5.1 of draft 6, it looks
> like the subscripts are mixed up. There is a 1 subscript on <import set>
> and no subscript on the second identifier.
>
> Also, I think the syntax of library rename clauses in �7.1.6 is
> wrong. After the <import set> it has "<export spec>+", but that doesn't
> match "(<identifier> <identifier>)+".

Both fixed and pushed.  Thank you for your careful scrutiny of the syntax.

--
John Cowan   cowan@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British
Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence
of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1.  I doubt if
the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of
equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940