-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> However, maintaining logical consistency is an important
> goal in language design.  The main goal of specifying a
> language is not to make the job of the compiler writer
> easy.  If that was the goal we could adopt "C".  We
> should make a language we like.  The compiler writers I
> know are surely good enough to handle small complexities
> like this.

I must admit, I've come to agree, despite having voted for the r6rs
approach in http://trac.sacrideo.us/wg/wiki/WG1Ballot3Results; I think,
at the time, I was distracted about defining equivalence of procedures
in the full that-would-mean-solving-the-halting-problem sense, but we
can have a workable definition of eqv? based on the point in time of
closure creation - and I certainly don't see how compilers can have any
trouble reconciling that with inlining.

One for R8RS, eh? :-)

ABS

- --
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=BEW4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports