> would evolve our language faster.

Not to pick a fight or anything, but if you go into a design process with
words like "faster" in your mind, you're going to end up with something
like R6RS.  The Haskell people you quote were very explicit that the goal
of their design process was to evolve /slowly/, which is the correct goal.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports