[scheme-reports-wg1] Equality of records John Cowan (01 Mar 2012 18:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records Ray Dillinger (01 Mar 2012 19:15 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records John Cowan (02 Mar 2012 16:51 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records Alaric Snell-Pym (02 Mar 2012 17:04 UTC)
Re: [scheme-reports-wg1] Equality of records Alex Shinn (02 Mar 2012 01:45 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Equality of records John Cowan 02 Mar 2012 16:49 UTC

Ray Dillinger scripsit:

> If it requires pairs, vectors, and strings. to be recursively compared,
> then it is not sensible to require records *not* to be recursively
> compared.

One problem is that there is no portable way to ask if two records
have the same type, which should certainly be a requirement for equality.

--
We are lost, lost.  No name, no business, no Precious, nothing.  Only empty.
Only hungry: yes, we are hungry.  A few little fishes, nassty bony little
fishes, for a poor creature, and they say death.  So wise they are; so just,
so very just.  --Gollum        cowan@ccil.org  http://ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports