Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers

Show/hide message thread

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo (12 May 2011 07:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alex Shinn (12 May 2011 07:38 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo (12 May 2011 08:51 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (12 May 2011 09:33 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alex Shinn (13 May 2011 01:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Eli Barzilay (13 May 2011 01:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alex Shinn (13 May 2011 07:57 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Alaric Snell-Pym (13 May 2011 08:35 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo (20 May 2011 07:32 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] [wg2] in support of single-arity procedural syntax transformers Andy Wingo 20 May 2011 07:32 UTC

On Fri 13 May 2011 03:08, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@gmail.com> writes:

>> I wish you would address my points instead of parody and questioning my
>> motivation.
>
> The parody was meant in friendly jest, and seemed the quickest
> way to make my point - sorry if it came across otherwise.

Apologies for overreacting then.

Cheers,

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports