Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS John Cowan (04 May 2013 19:17 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS Vassil Nikolov (04 May 2013 20:20 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS John Cowan (04 May 2013 20:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS Vassil Nikolov (04 May 2013 20:52 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: R7RS John Cowan 04 May 2013 20:37 UTC

Vassil Nikolov scripsit:

>   And answering this question should especially take into account
>   whether, like procedures (and unlike numbers, immutable lists,
>   immutable strings, immutable vectors), there is no other way of
>   testing those values for equality.

In R6RS, you can write a portable reflective equality predicate that
descends through records.  In R7RS-small you cannot, because there are
no record inspection procedures.  In both cases, both immutable and
mutable records are considered to have identity.

--
John Cowan              cowan@ccil.org          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
C'est la` pourtant que se livre le sens du dire, de ce que, s'y conjuguant
le nyania qui bruit des sexes en compagnie, il supplee a ce qu'entre eux,
de rapport nyait pas.               --Jacques Lacan, "L'Etourdit"

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports