[Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(20 Jan 2012 21:35 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(20 Jan 2012 22:03 UTC)
|
Re: fresh empty strings
Arthur A. Gleckler
(20 Jan 2012 22:55 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings John Cowan (21 Jan 2012 03:36 UTC)
|
Re: fresh empty strings
Arthur A. Gleckler
(21 Jan 2012 06:56 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(21 Jan 2012 13:24 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(21 Jan 2012 13:34 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(21 Jan 2012 13:47 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(21 Jan 2012 14:38 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Aubrey Jaffer
(21 Jan 2012 18:31 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(21 Jan 2012 19:04 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Ray Dillinger
(21 Jan 2012 17:05 UTC)
|
Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit: > > > (eq? (list) (list)) => #f > > > > Typo or thinko? Clearly I meant #t here. > > > > Just to make it faster for us to look up, where in the report do you see > this? Every empty list is eq? to every other, for there is only one empty list. The standard does not say whether all empty strings, empty vectors, or empty bytevectors are eq? to each other -- it's an implementation choice. I'm away from my Schemes now, so I can't test them. -- Real FORTRAN programmers can program FORTRAN John Cowan in any language. --Ed Post cowan@ccil.org