Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Andre van Tonder (15 Aug 2011 20:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer (16 Aug 2011 17:29 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Andre van Tonder (16 Aug 2011 20:03 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 20:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer (18 Aug 2011 16:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer (02 Oct 2011 03:03 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) Aubrey Jaffer (03 Oct 2011 02:09 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Numerical example (real? -2.5+0.0i) John Cowan 16 Aug 2011 20:48 UTC

Andre van Tonder scripsit:

> If the term "general" is still used in R7RS to refer to a /proper
> subset/ of the complex numbers (haven't done a search), I would say
> that this is a confusing usage and should probably be changed.  To
> most people, "general" does not mean a proper subset.

It's "general" as in "general case" (the general case being a proper
subset of all cases), but I have removed the remaining two uses from
the trunk.

--
John Cowan                              <cowan@ccil.org>
            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
                .e'osai ko sarji la lojban.
                Please support Lojban!          http://www.lojban.org

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports