Re: Comments on draft 6 Arthur A. Gleckler (24 Feb 2012 05:10 UTC)
(missing)
Re: Comments on draft 6 Arthur A. Gleckler (24 Feb 2012 05:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 John Cowan (24 Feb 2012 06:09 UTC)
Re: Comments on draft 6 Arthur A. Gleckler (24 Feb 2012 06:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Aaron W. Hsu (24 Feb 2012 23:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Andy Wingo (24 Feb 2012 12:35 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Jussi Piitulainen (24 Feb 2012 12:53 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Andy Wingo (24 Feb 2012 14:54 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Jussi Piitulainen (24 Feb 2012 15:23 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Andy Wingo (24 Feb 2012 16:24 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Aaron W. Hsu (24 Feb 2012 23:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Aaron W. Hsu (24 Feb 2012 23:34 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Andy Wingo (25 Feb 2012 18:00 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Marc Feeley (24 Feb 2012 15:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 John Cowan (24 Feb 2012 21:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Aaron W. Hsu (25 Feb 2012 00:28 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 John Cowan (25 Feb 2012 07:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Andy Wingo 24 Feb 2012 14:54 UTC

On Fri 24 Feb 2012 13:53, Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> writes:

> Implementations can do anything they like when the report says "it is
> an error".

Implementations can do whatever they like, in general ;-)

But consider:

  (define t 1)
  (let ()
    (define-syntax define-const
      (syntax-rules ()
        ((_ var val)
         (begin
           (define t val)
           (define (var) t)))))
    (define-const foo 2)
    t)

In Scheme, this must evaluate to 1.  I think all implementations support
this.

Now consider:

  (define t 1)
  (define-syntax define-const
    (syntax-rules ()
      ((_ var val)
       (begin
         (define t val)
         (define (var) t)))))
  (define-const foo 2)
  t

Does Scheme consider it a goal to specify the result of this program?

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports