On 05/19/2011 12:50 PM, Emmanuel Medernach wrote:
> PS: For me the real problem is elsewhere: I really dislike to have a
> value which is an unspecified one, I prefer instead that implementations
> return nothing - as in (values)

In Kawa set! returns no values.  I think this makes the REPL nicer:
set!, define, and similar forms return no values, which prints out as
nothing.
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports