Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling John Cowan (08 Aug 2011 19:31 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling Per Bothner (08 Aug 2011 21:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling John Cowan (08 Aug 2011 23:15 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling Jussi Piitulainen (15 Aug 2011 09:00 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] exception handling John Cowan 08 Aug 2011 23:13 UTC

Per Bothner scripsit:

> Assuming guard is definable in terms of with-exception-handler,
> there should be a definition in section 7.3 "Derived expression types".

There should, indeed, but no one has written one.  Contributions are
earnestly solicited.

> In general, the division of the report into separate chapters
> for Expressions, Program structure, and Standard procedures, is quite
> unnatural.

One of the complaints about R6RS was that nobody could find things, despite the
a priori more rational organization.  The WG voted to keep the R5RS organizations
so far as practical.

--
We pledge allegiance to the penguin             John Cowan
and to the intellectual property regime         cowan@ccil.org
for which he stands, one world under            http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Linux, with free music and open source
software for all.               --Julian Dibbell on Brazil, edited

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports