On 10/17/2014 05:53 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> But there really shouldn't be any difference between defining an
> undefined identifier as a variable and redefining an existing ordinary
> (non-auxiliary) syntax keyword as a variable, either.

5.2 Import declarations seems to disagree:

"In a program or library declaration, it is an error to import
the same identifier more than once with different bindings,
or to redefine or mutate an imported binding with a defi-
nition or with set!, or to refer to an identifier before it is
imported. However, a REPL should permit these actions".
--
	--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com   http://per.bothner.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports