Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Andre van Tonder (03 Aug 2011 16:30 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 17:32 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Alex Queiroz (03 Aug 2011 18:09 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 18:39 UTC)
Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Aug 2011 20:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Jim Wise (03 Aug 2011 21:10 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Aaron W. Hsu (03 Aug 2011 22:30 UTC)
Re: Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Arthur A. Gleckler (03 Aug 2011 22:34 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Draft 3 Comments: Chapter 5 Alex Queiroz 03 Aug 2011 18:08 UTC

Hallo,

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Jim Wise <jwise@draga.com> wrote:
>
> It also seems to me that once you strike Schemes with no recent history
> of being updated *at all* from the list of implementations, the majority
> of implementations *did* adopt R6RS, so I'm not sure what "disastrous"
> means, either.
>

It's not only about the number of implementations, but the number of
users as well. Strike Chicken and Gambit, and you lose a lot of them.

--
-alex
http://www.artisancoder.com/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports