[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot
John Cowan 29 Apr 2014 16:33 UTC
Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer scripsit:
> (FWIW I'm leaning towards voting no to all and asking them be optional
> modules like everything else, as Peter Bex suggested.)
<chair hat="off">
The thing is, there's no way to do them as Scheme libraries or even
Scheme-compatible libraries, except to rebind the base numeric procedures
(as the Chicken egg does), which produces messy results. So I would urge
you not to do that.
</chair>
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Today an interactive brochure website, tomorrow a global content
management system that leverages collective synergy to drive "outside of
the box" thinking and formulate key objectives into a win-win game plan
with a quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players
to drive-up their core competencies and increase expectations with an
all-around initiative to drive up the bottom-line. --Alex Papadimoulis
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.