[scheme-reports-wg2] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 03:49 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Jay Freeman (29 Apr 2014 06:51 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (29 Apr 2014 07:55 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Jay Freeman (29 Apr 2014 08:37 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 11:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 13:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 14:01 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (29 Apr 2014 14:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (29 Apr 2014 14:25 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (29 Apr 2014 22:13 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 22:54 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (30 Apr 2014 12:59 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (30 Apr 2014 16:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Peter Bex (01 May 2014 08:57 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Jussi Piitulainen (29 Apr 2014 13:58 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (29 Apr 2014 16:14 UTC)
[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 16:33 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Devon Schudy (29 Apr 2014 15:38 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan (29 Apr 2014 17:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Devon Schudy (01 May 2014 13:02 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Alaric Snell-Pym (01 May 2014 13:11 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Takashi Kato (29 Apr 2014 20:07 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Perry E. Metzger (29 Apr 2014 22:48 UTC)
Re: [scheme-reports-wg2] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer (30 Apr 2014 07:44 UTC)

[scheme-reports-wg2] Re: [Scheme-reports] Reformulated numeric-tower ballot John Cowan 29 Apr 2014 16:33 UTC

Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer scripsit:

> (FWIW I'm leaning towards voting no to all and asking them be optional
> modules like everything else, as Peter Bex suggested.)

<chair hat="off">
The thing is, there's no way to do them as Scheme libraries or even
Scheme-compatible libraries, except to rebind the base numeric procedures
(as the Chicken egg does), which produces messy results. So I would urge
you not to do that.
</chair>

--
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        cowan@ccil.org
Today an interactive brochure website, tomorrow a global content
management system that leverages collective synergy to drive "outside of
the box" thinking and formulate key objectives into a win-win game plan
with a quality-driven approach that focuses on empowering key players
to drive-up their core competencies and increase expectations with an
all-around initiative to drive up the bottom-line. --Alex Papadimoulis

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "scheme-reports-wg2" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to scheme-reports-wg2+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.