Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.3 Syntax Definitions
Andre van Tonder 02 Jun 2011 17:40 UTC
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, John Cowan wrote:
> Jonathan Kraut scripsit:
>
>> I hope WG1 will reconsider lifting the restriction that "any
>> internal syntax definitions in a body must come before any internal
>> definitions."
>
> Ticket filed. Another possible resolution is to clarify that this
> restriction only applies *before* macroexpansion is done.
How do you decide if a form is a definition or syntax definition before
macroexpanding it?
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports