This is a Formal Response to Formal Comment #382:

Allow "if" to accept arbitrarily many if-then pairs

The editors rejected this request as too late and unlikely to survive
a ballot.  It is trivial to redefine `if` to work this way.

If you are dissatisfied with this Formal Response, please let us know.
Thank you for participating in the R7RS process.

--
John Cowan  cowan@ccil.org   http://ccil.org/~cowan
It's the old, old story.  Droid meets droid.  Droid becomes chameleon.
Droid loses chameleon, chameleon becomes blob, droid gets blob back
again.  It's a classic tale.  --Kryten, Red Dwarf

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports