-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/30/2011 02:07 PM, Alex Shinn wrote:

> Chicken's inline egg would not support this.  That's intended
> for inline C code, but could be modified and used as an EVAL
> replacement.

Actually, while I'm at it, can the inline egg and/or Larceny support
literal unrepresentables indirectly via the trick Per Bothner suggested
earlier? Namely, that such unrepresentables are replaced by placeholders
which are filled in at run-time?

ABS

- --
Alaric Snell-Pym
http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk6FwGkACgkQRgz/WHNxCGo99QCggkfLK6dhxr2Gkkq6i4OLo1W2
i/0AoJRE2AO55dPFREiN7TnLooV70rbH
=SxZx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports