[Scheme-reports] Features Michael Montague (03 Nov 2013 22:22 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Features John Cowan (04 Nov 2013 06:48 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Features Michael Montague (04 Nov 2013 08:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Features Michael Montague (05 Nov 2013 03:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Features John Cowan (05 Nov 2013 05:08 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Features Alex Shinn (05 Nov 2013 16:11 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Features John Cowan 04 Nov 2013 04:41 UTC

Michael Montague scripsit:

> R7RS lists i386, x86-64, and gnu-linux as possible
> features. Presumably, i386 should be a feature for the 32 bit version,
> and x86-64 for the 64 bit version.

That's exactly the Right Thing.

> I can make Linux lowercase and easily check for Linux and change it to
> gnu-linux, but I am leery of doing that.

Why are you leary?  That's the intention.

> In order for features to be useful across implementations, the symbols
> must be exactly the same.

Which is exactly why you should do it.

--
                Si hoc legere scis, nimium eruditionis habes.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports