Re: [Scheme-reports] Language changes section of the latest draft
John Cowan 29 Jan 2013 16:41 UTC
Jeronimo Pellegrini scripsit:
> And actually, some of the points have a small rationale (like this one),
> but others don't (like the removal of the transcript-* procedures).
We don't really know the rationale for the latter: the WG voted to remove
them without any real discussion of the point.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan@ccil.org
Be yourself. Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists. Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass. --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports