What I am trying to say is that there is not much point (at this stage)
trying to define standard interfaces for libraries that can be implemented
portably. Users can and will define this.

It is the ones that cannot be implemented portably that should follow a
standard interface. Only the implementer can deal with that.

> Perhaps standard interfaces and *behavior* should be defined as Scheme
> will be stuck in toy land forever...

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports