On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Jussi Piitulainen
<jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> At the page break 73-74, I wonder how appropriate it is to promote the
> old Indiana repository. Shouldn't it be labelled historical and
> not-up-to-date-in-any-way if it's mentioned at all? I'm sure
> schemers.org links to it, and schemers.org seems to be the good
> starting point now.

We'll revisit this.  I actually wanted to expand
that section further but there aren't a lot of
non-partisan resources out there.  I think the
freenode #scheme IRC channel may be worth
mentioning.

--
Alex

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports