[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Alex Queiroz (16 Aug 2011 11:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Andy Wingo (16 Aug 2011 13:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Grant Rettke (16 Aug 2011 14:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 14:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 14:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 14:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington 16 Aug 2011 14:44 UTC

Am 16.08.2011 16:11, schrieb Grant Rettke:
>  From what I read there was a lot of outrage against the private
> mailing lists that effected the R6RS standard.
>
> Are there private mailing lists that effect the standard new standard
> as well? :(

Why is it that scheme-implementors is private? It doesn't seem as if
discussions between implementors of Scheme implementation are so
sensitive that they require the public to be shut out. In any case,
please keep all important discussions about R7RS public - this includes
feedback given on scheme-implementors, if possible (that is, if the ones
who have given feedback agree).

Let's keep everything transparent.

Regards,
Denis

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports