Re: [Scheme-reports] Legacy caar to cddddr
John Cowan 20 Oct 2011 17:51 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> We should put them somewhere for compatibility, but
> I definitely think everything but the one and two depth
> combinations should be removed from (scheme base).
> Their use is generally a code smell. People should
> use destructuring, records, or SRFI-1 first..tenth accessors.
Ticket filed.
--
Only do what only you can do. John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
--Edsger W. Dijkstra's advice
to a student in search of a thesis
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports