Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? John Cowan (01 Dec 2013 20:13 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum? John Cowan 01 Dec 2013 16:51 UTC

Alex Shinn scripsit:

> Yes, it should be added to <pattern datum> as you say.

Added to both the errata page and the errata branch.

--
Principles.  You can't say A is         John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
made of B or vice versa.  All mass      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
is interaction.  --Richard Feynman

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports