Re: [Scheme-reports] Is <bytevector> missed out from the list of pattern datum?
John Cowan 01 Dec 2013 16:51 UTC
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> Yes, it should be added to <pattern datum> as you say.
Added to both the errata page and the errata branch.
--
Principles. You can't say A is John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
made of B or vice versa. All mass http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
is interaction. --Richard Feynman
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports