Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 00:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Alex Shinn (24 Dec 2010 00:21 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 00:27 UTC)
[Scheme-reports] Scheme is NOT spam! Vincent Manis (24 Dec 2010 02:41 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Thomas Bushnell, BSG (24 Dec 2010 00:26 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder (24 Dec 2010 02:39 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] *TELUS Detected Spam*Re: [r6rs-discuss] returning back to pattern matching Andre van Tonder 24 Dec 2010 02:39 UTC

On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, John Cowan wrote:

> Nobody knows what "most" Scheme programmers need, hence the fairly large
> set in WG2.  If some turn out to go unimplemented or unused, they can be
> removed in R8RS, since they are all optional.

In any language aspiring to be taken seriously, it is quite difficult to take
something out once in the standard.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports