Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs John Cowan (20 May 2011 22:04 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs Aaron W. Hsu (20 May 2011 22:37 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs John Cowan (20 May 2011 23:37 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] 5.1 programs John Cowan 20 May 2011 23:00 UTC

Aaron W. Hsu scripsit:

> Unfortunately, this is not true. At least, this is not true in general.
> Considering the limited subset of Scheme that WG1 is dealing with, I would
> consider them the same, but as soon as thing like low-level macros come
> into play, there are distinct differences among major implementations.

Yes, I was speaking only of syntax-rules macros, where there are no
phasing issues.

--
The experiences of the past show                John Cowan
that there has always been a discrepancy        cowan@ccil.org
between plans and performance.                  http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --Emperor Hirohito, August 1945

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports