|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 Jan 2012 13:28 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(23 Jan 2012 15:23 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(23 Jan 2012 15:34 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Ray Dillinger
(23 Jan 2012 20:17 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Andy Wingo
(23 Jan 2012 20:52 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(23 Jan 2012 23:05 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Vincent Manis
(24 Jan 2012 01:02 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 02:06 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Alaric Snell-Pym
(24 Jan 2012 09:37 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
John Cowan
(24 Jan 2012 15:10 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
xacc.ide@gmail.com
(24 Jan 2012 16:31 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Per Bothner
(24 Jan 2012 17:21 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings Andy Wingo (24 Jan 2012 17:00 UTC)
|
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] fresh empty strings
Aubrey Jaffer
(24 Jan 2012 02:16 UTC)
|
On Tue 24 Jan 2012 16:08, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes: > (let ((a x) (b x)) (eq? a b)) is always true, except where x is a > character or number. Except if x is identifier-syntax :) Andy -- http://wingolog.org/ _______________________________________________ Scheme-reports mailing list Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports
