Re: [Scheme-reports] ratification vote for R7RS-small
John Cowan 04 May 2013 01:24 UTC
Per Bothner scripsit:
> Likewise, I would have preferred to use the R6RS library
> keywords, and just standardize a subset on the R6RS functionality,
> even at the risk of some edge-case incompatibility.
We believed that we needed the ability to extend the syntax at the
implementation level, without having to require low-level macros
in the small language standard. That meant a distinction between
library declarations and macro invocations.
--
Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
--Arthur C. Clarke, "The Nine Billion Names of God"
John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports