[Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Alex Queiroz (16 Aug 2011 11:44 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Andy Wingo (16 Aug 2011 13:27 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Grant Rettke (16 Aug 2011 14:12 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 14:45 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? John Cowan (16 Aug 2011 14:47 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Denis Washington (16 Aug 2011 14:53 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Fwd: Feedback from implementors? Grant Rettke 16 Aug 2011 14:11 UTC

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Alex Queiroz <asandroq@gmail.com> wrote:
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Felix <felix@call-with-current-continuation.org>
> Date: Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 12:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [Scheme-reports] Feedback from implementors?
> To: Peter.Bex@xs4all.nl
> Cc: denisw@online.de, asandroq@gmail.com
>
> Alex Shinn did a poll on the "scheme-implementors" mailing list
> recently (a non-public mailing list hosted by google groups)

From what I read there was a lot of outrage against the private
mailing lists that effected the R6RS standard.

Are there private mailing lists that effect the standard new standard
as well? :(

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports