On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 4:39 PM, Alex Shinn <alexshinn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Given these are minor cases I think it's a more
> appropriate feature for the large language.

Or another srfi.  Something similar to Common Lisp's
lisp-implementation-type and
lisp-implementation-version can be a small srfi that most
implementations can easily provide.

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports