Andre van Tonder scripsit:

>> 0.0 just means a number x such that 0 < x < the smallest representable
>> inexact number.
>
> I think that's a contradiction in terms. :) If inexact numbers like
> 0.0 represent intervals, then the smallest representable inexact
> number is presumably also an interval, and cannot be the endpoint of
> an interval.

Yes.  I should have said "the smallest positive number representable as
a flonum."

--
Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your    John Cowan
ear.  However, I would suggest you wash your    cowan@ccil.org
hands thoroughly before going to the toilet.    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
        --gadicath

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports