On Thu 19 May 2011 20:10, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> writes:

> Andy Wingo scripsit:
>> Perhaps elide the mention of `nil'.  It should be fairly well-known now.
>
> Not as long as CL still exists.

I meant to say that anyone who knows about `nil' is probably aware that
Scheme does it differently.

FWIW, there are more programmers out there who think that 0 is false, so
if anything were to be noted, it would be that; but I don't think it's
Scheme's place to do either.

Just MHO :)

Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports