Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 John Cowan (23 Feb 2012 22:33 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Vitaly Magerya (23 Feb 2012 23:18 UTC)
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Emmanuel Medernach (24 Feb 2012 07:28 UTC)

Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 John Cowan 23 Feb 2012 22:33 UTC

Vitaly Magerya scripsit:

> My argument is this: all useful things you can do with TAI, but
> cannot do with current-jiffy, can (and should) be done using a
> proper date library (the one that reports 23:59:60 on leap seconds).
> Since you can't implement such a library using only TAI (you need
> leap second and timezone tables), and since it's problematic to
> obtain TAI on many current systems, I argue that R7RS-small should
> only provide a timer (current-jiffy), and R7RS-big should provide
> a full date library.

I think there is utility to providing a timestamp of modest accuracy and
precision for applications like logging, which is why I proposed
this procedure in the first place.

--
A witness cannot give evidence of his           John Cowan
age unless he can remember being born.          cowan@ccil.org
  --Judge Blagden                               http://www.ccil.org/~cowan

_______________________________________________
Scheme-reports mailing list
Scheme-reports@scheme-reports.org
http://lists.scheme-reports.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/scheme-reports