Re: Comments on draft 6
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Feb 2012 05:10 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
John Cowan
(24 Feb 2012 05:40 UTC)
|
Re: Comments on draft 6
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Feb 2012 05:47 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
John Cowan
(24 Feb 2012 06:09 UTC)
|
Re: Comments on draft 6
Arthur A. Gleckler
(24 Feb 2012 06:12 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6 Aaron W. Hsu (24 Feb 2012 23:27 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Andy Wingo
(24 Feb 2012 12:35 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Jussi Piitulainen
(24 Feb 2012 12:53 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Andy Wingo
(24 Feb 2012 14:54 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Jussi Piitulainen
(24 Feb 2012 15:23 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Andy Wingo
(24 Feb 2012 16:24 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 Feb 2012 23:41 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Aaron W. Hsu
(24 Feb 2012 23:34 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Andy Wingo
(25 Feb 2012 18:00 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Marc Feeley
(24 Feb 2012 15:55 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
John Cowan
(24 Feb 2012 21:22 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
Aaron W. Hsu
(25 Feb 2012 00:28 UTC)
|
Re: [Scheme-reports] Comments on draft 6
John Cowan
(25 Feb 2012 07:28 UTC)
|
Coming from a Chez Scheme background, I am not sure what to make of this. Chez Scheme does implicitly bind all identifiers at the REPL, but it is an error to SET! an undefined variable. This leads to some interesting behavior in REPLs, since all variables have implicit bindings there, but in R6RS Libraries or in scripts, the top-levels start off explicitly empty. This means that if you enter a REPL, you can evaluate (SET! X 5) and not get a problem, but if you were to try to do that inside of a library like (LIBRARY (MY-X) (EXPORT X) (IMPORT (CHEZSCHEME)) (SET! X 5)), you would find an error when you try to load that library. This means that Chez Scheme seems like it might be one of those in which it allows SET! on undefined variables, but in reality, it doesn't actually do that. I'm not sure how the wording ought to be made here. -- Aaron W. Hsu | arcfide@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us Programming is just another word for the lost art of thinking.